Legal Opinion

Shelly & Sands, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1984No. 83-1648PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The standards for a valid zoning referendum petition have been established by this court in a number of cases. This court has held that the petition must contain an accurate and unambiguous summary of the issue sought to be submitted to the electorate. If the summary is misleading, inaccurate, or contains material omissions which would confuse the average person, the petition is invalid and may not form the basis for submission to a vote. Markus v. Bd. of Elections (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 197 [51 O.O.2d 277]. We hold that the petition here failed to live up to those standards.

*142Applying the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Christy v. Summit Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Hazel v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API