Legal Opinion

Marriage of Savoren v. Savoren

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1986No. C4-85-1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal presents the question of the applicability of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Family Court Dissolution Matters. William Savoren appeals from an order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and a reduction in spousal maintenance and awarding Cecilia Savoren $1,000 in attorney’s fees. We affirm.

FACTS

A judgment and decree was entered in 1977 dissolving the parties’ marriage. The decree was based on a stipulation in which appellant agreed to pay $350 per month in permanent spousal maintenance.

In December 1984 appellant lost his job. After unsuccessfully…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Saturnini v. SaturniniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Heaton v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. AbuzzahabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of Lappi v. LappiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kroeplin v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Tuthill v. TuthillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Martinez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. Marriage of Fuller v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API