Marriage of Tuthill v. Tuthill

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

James Tuthill appeals from the trial court’s order denying a reduction in maintenance, including a retroactive reduction, and awarding attorney’s fees to respondent, Sharon Tuthill. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant and respondent had been married for seventeen years and had four children when their marriage was dissolved in 1973. Appellant’s 1973 income was $48,-000, which included an extraordinary payment of $23,000 he had made to himself from his business. Respondent was a homemaker at the time of the dissolution and had no income.

The stipulated judgment and decree granted…