Legal Opinion

People v. Lugo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1963No. Crim. 1759PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

JThe defendant, appellant herein, was charged with, tried by a jury for, and convicted of the offense of selling a narcotic, to wit, heroin, i.e., a violation of section 11501 of the Health & Safety Code; also was charged with two prior convictions, i.e., burglary in the second degree and robbery by assault, which he initially denied but thereafter admitted; moved for a new trial, which was denied; and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and contends that it should be reversed because he was denied a fair trial in that: (1) he was not permitted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. MonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. NeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re NodayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API