Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1969No. Crim. 11316PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of murder in the first degree and fixed the penalty at death. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and a motion to vacate the order denying a new trial based on newly discovered evidence was also denied. This appeal is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).)

Facts-. Phyllis Jane Black, the victim, and her husband, Richard James Black, lived at 11780 Encino Avenue, Granada Hills, in Los Angeles County. They had been married about two years and were expecting their first child. On August 3, 1966, when Mr. Black returned home from work about 7:10p.m. he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API