Legal Opinion

In Re Noday

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1981No. Crim. 40184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Procedural History

Defendant Noday and codefendant Smart were by indictment each charged with seven counts, including grand theft, conspiracy to commit *510grand theft, conspiracy to cheat and defraud, and conspiracy to commit murder. Noday’s codefendant Maldonado was charged in two of the seven counts; Noday’s codefendant Jones was charged in three of the counts.

Severance was granted to codefendants Smart and Jones; defendant Noday was tried with codefendant Maldonado. Both defendant and Maldonado were represented throughout the proceedings by Attorney Stephen Gillis.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. TrotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Tyson v. District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. In Re NodayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. P. v. Sandoval CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API