Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Pearce Woolen Mills, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court vacating the appearance of an attorney for Pearce Woolen Mills, Inc. (Pearce), an attaching creditor of one Richard S. Marcus, a son and heir at law of the testator.

Maurice Marcus died on August 11, 1966. His heirs at law were his widow, a son, a daughter and two grandchildren. The widow filed a petition for probate of the testator’s will, under the terms of which she was the sole beneficiary. The testator died seized of real estate in Worcester County. On October 6, 1966, Pearce made an attachment “of the real estate of Richard S. Marcus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bressler v. AverbuckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Finer v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Lee v. KeechCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Nantucket Express Lines, Inc. v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Maddocks v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Creed v. ApogMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Peebles v. MinnisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API