Legal Opinion
Bressler v. Averbuck
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 5, 1947PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff seeks by this bill in equity to establish a debt under the so called gaming statute (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 137, § 1) and to reach the interest of the defendant Samuel Averbuck in a partnership1 and apply it to the satisfaction of the debt. Samuel Averbuck, hereinafter called the defendant, demurred to the bill, and an interlocutory decree was entered on January 9, 1947, sustaining the demurrer with leave to amend within ten days. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a motion2 to amend the suit in equity into an action at law; the motion also asked that a declaration annexed thereto,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stockbridge v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Rigs v. SokolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Nelson Theatre Co. v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rafferty v. Sancta Maria HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Edgar H. Wood Associates, Inc. v. SkeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Hill v. Trustees of Glenwood CemeteryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Salvucci v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.