Legal Opinion
DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 16, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
This appeal arises from the denial of a motion by the plaintiff Anita Faye DiLuzio for the admission pro hac vice of a staff attorney from The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. (foundation), to represent her along with local counsel in an action brought against the defendant labor unions. The trial judge denied the plaintiff s motion, and we granted the plaintiff’s application for direct appellate review. We find no abuse of discretion in the judge’s decision to deny the pro hac vice motion, and thus we affirm the ruling below.
This dispute over the admission of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Superadio Ltd. Partnership v. Winstar Radio Productions, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Old Rochester Regional Teacher's Club v. Old Rochester Regional School District CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.