Legal Opinion
Crichton v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1944PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, as competitors of Associated Transport, Inc., a motor truck line, bring this action under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41(28), 43-48, and 49 U.S.C.A. § 305(g), to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated November 2, 1943, which granted Associated the certificate of public convenience and necessity required by Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, formerly the Motor Carrier Act, 1935, §§ 206(a), 207(a), 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 306(a), 307(a), to enable it to act as a common carrier of property by motor vehicle in interstate commerce over regular routes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- A. B. & C. Motor Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.