Michael v. City of Atoka
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Atoka County; J. H. Linebaugh, Judge. < Action on contract b-y M. D. Michael against the City of Atoka. Prom judgment for defendant, the plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action on contract, for the recovery of money, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below. Hereafter for convenience the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The petition of the plaintiff contained two counts, but as only the first count is involved in .this proceeding in error it will not be necessary to notice the second. The first cause of action was for an alleged balance due upon a written contract by the terms of which it was agreed that, for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Board of Com'rs of Washita County v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Offutt v. WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- United States Rubber Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Dougherty-Nichols Construction Co. v. Town of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Comstock v. City of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.