Legal Opinion
Comstock v. City of Commerce
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1924No. 13966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, C.
On the 14th day of June, 1921, the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, commenced an action in the county court of Ottawa county against the defendant in error, defendant below, to recover a judgment for an alleged balance due for the construction of certain public improvements for said defendant city. The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiffs and defendants as they were designated in the trial court.
Pursuant to an ordinance passed and approved by said defendant city on the 13th day cf May, 1919, an election was called for June 10, 1919, for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- In Re Town of AftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Board of Com'rs of Washita County v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dowler v. State Ex Rel. PruntySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wilson v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Board Com'rs Leflore Cty. v. Central Nat.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935