Legal Opinion

People v. Koester

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1975No. Crim. 14084PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAZARUS, J. *

There is but one issue for determination on this appeal. Did the trial court properly rule that because appellant was charged with violating Health and Safety Code section 11368 (issuing fictitious prescriptions for narcotic drugs) he is not eligible for diversion as a drug offender to a treatment and rehabilitation center under Penal Code sections 1OOO~1OOO.4 1 as a matter of law?

From the record before us appellant, an orthopedic physician and surgeon with an otherwise unblemished record, would appear to be the kind of person who would be most likely to benefit from this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Parra v. Municipal Court for San Leandro-Hayward Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Maris Management Corp. v. Assured Drywall & TexturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API