Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Duncan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1990No. E007237PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Factual and Procedural History

This case involves the question of whether defendant was eligible for pretrial diversion on a first-time drug offense. The facts of the case are not in dispute. Police arrested defendant on suspicion of driving a vehicle while under the influence of a controlled substance and alcohol. Defendant submitted to a blood test which revealed that she had a blood level of .14 percent alcohol and 141 mg. cocaine. The People charged her with violation of one count each of being under the influence of a controlled substance (Health & Saf.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Moore v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. DarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. VanVleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Rash v. LungrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API