Legal Opinion
LCM Energy Solutions v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 26, 2012No. 12-321CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff LCM Energy Solutions is seeking money damages under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, 26 U.S.C. § 48, which directs the United States Treasury Department to award grants to entities that “place[d] in service” various types of “energy property,” such as solar panels, subject to certain conditions. Essentially, LCM claims that it did not receive the full amount of the grant to which it was entitled. The Government does not dispute that Section 1603 is a money-mandating…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- W.E. Partners II, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- RP1 Fuel Cell, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Clean Fuel Llc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.