Legal Opinion

Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 9, 2020No. 14-841Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-841C (Filed Under Seal: October 30, 2020) (Reissued: November 9, 2020) 1 ************************** * AMPERSAND CHOWCHILLA * American Recovery and BIOMASS, LLC, and MERCED * Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”); Pub. POWER, LLC, * Law. No. 111-5, Div. B, tit. I, § * 1603, 123 Stat. 115, 364-66 (2009); Plaintiffs, * Section 1603 Grant; Open-Loop * Biomass Facility; Specifically v. * Assigned Function; Oglethorpe * Factors; Placed in Service; THE UNITED STATES, * Statutory Interpretation. * Defendant. * * ************************** Stephen G. Leatham,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Virginian Hotel Corporation v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sealy Power, Ltd. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., and Affiliated Companies v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API