Legal Opinion
Clean Fuel Llc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 26, 2013No. 12-79TPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act; Subject matter jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Consequential damages; Lost profits; Tucker Act; “Money-mandating” source of law
OPINION AND ORDER
Block, Judge.
Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 (ARRTA), Pub.L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, provides, “Upon application, the Secretary of the Treasury shall, subject to the requirements of this section, provide a grant to each person who places in service specified energy property to reimburse such person” in an amount equal to “the applicable percentage basis of such property.”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- RP1 Fuel Cell, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Desert Sunlight 250, LLC v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Schneiter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022