Legal Opinion

Smith v. Iversen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1993No. 900341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Daniel B. Smith appeals from the lower court’s summary judgment against him on his personal injury claim against Monroe Iversen. The district court rejected Smith’s claim that Iversen, a co-employee, could be held personally liable to Smith for injuries inflicted when Iversen backed into him with a dump truck. Smith argues that the exclusive remedy provision of the Utah’s Workers’ Compensation Act, Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-60, does not preclude Iversen from being held liable to a fellow employee if Iversen is sued in his separate capacity as an owner and lessor of the dump…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bundy v. Century Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bingham Ex Rel. Austin v. Lagoon Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. WilkenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Stewart v. CMI Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Jenkins v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. Jenkins v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API