Legal Opinion
Weissman v. Quail Lodge Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1999No. 98-15131PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Lawrence W. Schonbrun, an attorney, appeals the district court’s order (“Order”) entered in this case that restricts his right to file objections to proposed Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), class action settlements in all future cases filed in the Northern District of California. Schonbrun also contends that the Order disparaged his professional conduct. We have jurisdiction of this appeal of a post-judgment order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand. Whether viewed as a sanction or as an attorney discipline order, the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Pacific Harbor Capital, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellee v. Carnival Air Lines, Inc.,defendant, and Jeffrey M. Herman Stuart S. Mermelstein, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.