Legal Opinion

United States v. Borden Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1962No. 439PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This is a direct appeal1 from a judgment dismissing the Government’s Section 2 (a) Clayton Act2 suit in which it sought an injunction against the selling of fluid milk products by the appellees, The Borden Company and Bowman Dairy Company, at prices which discriminate between independently owned grocery stores and grocery store chains. The District Court in an unreported decision found the pricing plan of each dairy to be a prima facie violation of § 2 (a) but concluded that these discriminatory prices were legalized by the cost justification proviso of § 2 (a), which permits price…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. Borden Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Tidewater Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Beatrice Foods Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Aubrey D. Hanson D/B/A Hanson Paint & Glass Company v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Industries, Inc., Formerly Pittsburgh Plate Glass CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Holleb & Company v. Produce Terminal Cold Storage Co. And Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API