Legal Opinion

United States v. Borden Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 30, 1953No. 51 C 947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

1. The government charges that' each of ten defendant dairy companies has been engaged in a conspiracy to restrain and to monopolize, and has monopolized interstate trade and commerce in the sale of fluid milk to wholesale customers and certain public institutions in the Chicago area, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act-, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2. The government also charges that each of ten defendant dairy companies has sold fluid milk in interstate trade and commerce to different wholesale purchasers in the Chicago area at prices which discriminate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Gary Theatre Co. v. Columbia Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Allred v. SasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Chicago Seating Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beatrice Foods Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Philip Klein v. The Lionel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Z. T. Naifeh, Dba Sooner Sales Co. v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Fred Huber v. American President Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API