Legal Opinion
Smith v. Neville
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1995No. 18981PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice
(on reassignment).
Shawn Curtis Smith (Smith) appeals a summary judgment in his negligence action against Fredrick H. Neville (Neville). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On February 13,1993 in Rapid City, South Dakota, a motor vehicle operated by Smith collided with a snow plow operated by Ne-ville. Smith sustained various injuries as a result of the accident and, on June 23, 1994, he caused a summons and complaint for negligence to be served on Neville. Neville answered alleging that, at all times material to the accident, he was an employee of the South Dakota Department of Transportation. As an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Budahl v. Gordon & David AssociatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Finck v. City of TeaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Brishky v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Tunender v. MinnaertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bell v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.