Legal Opinion

Budahl v. Gordon & David Associates

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1980No. 12742PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Deanna Budahl commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries that she allegedly suffered after falling on ice on the sidewalk in front of Gordon and David Associates, a place of business in the city of Brookings. Appellant Loren Bu-dahl, Deanna Budahl’s husband, brought an action for loss of consortium in connection with his wife’s personal injury action. The Budahls appeal from the summary judgment entered against them. We affirm.

I

The injury occurred on February 28,1977. Mrs. Budahl gave notice to the city pursuant to SDCL 9-24-2 on September…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hunter v. North Mason School Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Lunday Ex Rel. Lunday v. VogelmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Marrujo v. New Mexico State Highway Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API