Legal Opinion
Stanton v. Highland Hospital of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant proffered evidentiary proof establishing that plaintiff’s employment was at will and that there was no express agreement that limited defendant’s right to terminate plaintiff’s employment (see, Sabetay v Sterling Drug, 69 NY2d 329; Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 58 NY2d 293; Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 NY2d 458; Backus *855v Planned Parenthood, 161 AD2d 1116; Valvo v Chautauqua Area Girl Scout Council, 159 AD2d 1021; Collins v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Collins v. Hoselton Datsun, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Backus v. Planned Parenthood of Finger Lakes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rich v. Cooper Vision, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Ashe v. Mohawk Valley Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Panek v. Toomey Residential & Community Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999