Legal Opinion

Panek v. Toomey Residential & Community Service Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the employee personnel manual does not limit or restrict defendant’s right to terminate plaintiff’s at-will employment (see, Matter of De Petris v Union Settlement Assn., 86 NY2d 406, 410; Moore v Anheuser-Busch, 221 AD2d 913; Stanton v Highland Hosp., 197 AD2d 854), nor was such right affected by plaintiff’s execution of the employee warning notice, which provided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Petris v. Union Settlement Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. McDowell v. DartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Stanton v. Highland Hospital of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Moore v. Anheuser-Busch, IncorporatedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API