Rich v. Cooper Vision, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the second and third causes of action of the amended complaint. The second cause of action alleges that plaintiff Michael N. Rich, Jr., was terminated from his employment with defendant Cooper Vision in violation of the terms of Cooper Vision’s employee handbook. Plaintiffs contend that the handbook amounts to a contractual agreement that employees will be terminated only for those reasons set forth in the manual. The handbook, however,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Monsanto v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Belanoff v. GraysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mohamed v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Murphy v. Cadillac Rubber & Plastics, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Gerzog v. London Fog Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Muller v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Laduke v. Hepburn Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.