Legal Opinion

Mead v. Hellams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1951No. 34033Published

1Opinion of the Court

205 Okla. 174 (1951)

236 P.2d 498

MEAD

v.

HELLAMS.

No. 34033.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 9, 1951.

Chas. D. Scales, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

O.A. Cargill, James R. Eagleton, and O.A. Cargill, Jr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

WELCH, J.

J.E. Hellams, Jr., recovered judgment against Emma I. Mead for the contract price of repairs made on the defendant's building, and for the foreclosure of lien for services performed and materials furnished, and the defendant appeals.

This is a second appeal arising from the action. In the first appeal, in Mead v. Hellams, 200 Okla. 381, 194…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API