Mead v. Hellams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
205 Okla. 174 (1951)
236 P.2d 498
MEAD
v.
HELLAMS.
No. 34033.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
October 9, 1951.
Chas. D. Scales, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
O.A. Cargill, James R. Eagleton, and O.A. Cargill, Jr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
WELCH, J.
J.E. Hellams, Jr., recovered judgment against Emma I. Mead for the contract price of repairs made on the defendant's building, and for the foreclosure of lien for services performed and materials furnished, and the defendant appeals.
This is a second appeal arising from the action. In the first appeal, in Mead v. Hellams, 200 Okla. 381, 194…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951