Legal Opinion

Bassen v. Monckton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 5, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas the plaintiffs brought suit to recover $736.77, foi materials furnished by them to the defendant Sue M. Monckton, and used by her in constructing' a building on her lot in the city of Hannibal. The plaintiffs asked judgment in that amount, and enforcement of mechanic’s lien against the lot.

The defendants Sue M. Monckton and her husband, Charles J. Monckton, filed an answer denying the allegations of the petition, and for an affirmative defense alleged that the plaintiffs, Bassen, Treat, Weber and Ruoff, during all the times mentioned in the petition, were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Downing v. RingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  4. Prince v. Eighth Street Baptist ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Automobile Gasoline Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Kusnetsky v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. Phillips v. Hoke Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Shrout v. TinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API