Legal Opinion

Prince v. Eighth Street Baptist Church

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge. The fact that the plaintiff had no’ license as a real estate agent is a question between him and the city, arid not between him and the defendant. Prietto v. Leíais, 11 Mo. App. 601.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

The plaintiff claims five hundred dollars damages for breach of contract. His petition contains two counts. The first count states a contract, whereby the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff a commission of two and a half per •cent on the sum of $20,000, if the plaintiff would find a *333purchaser for the defendant’s real estate at that figure, alleges performance of the contract on the plaintiff’s part, and prays judgment for the amount agreed upon. The second count is on a quantum meruit, for labor and services performed at the defendant’s request, states their' reasonable value at five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howell v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Michael v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alford v. CreaghAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Ehrhardt v. Robertson Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Reichardt v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. Tooker v. DuckworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Bassen v. MoncktonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API