United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Ramlose
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit.Court. — Hon. Joseph J. ’ Williams, Judge. (1) This court overlooked completely, in the former decision of this case, the fact that the plaintiff had purchased the machines themselves, as well as the contracts under which Ramlose held them, and based its decision on the question of the validity of the contract, ignoring entirely the title to the property.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit.Court. — Hon. Joseph J. ’ Williams, Judge. (1) This court overlooked completely, in the former decision of this case, the fact that the plaintiff had purchased the machines themselves, as well as the contracts under which Ramlose held them, and based its decision on the question of the validity of the contract, ignoring entirely the title to the property. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Ramlose, 210 Mo.' 631. (2) The plaintiff in this cause had complied with all of the requirements of the laws of Missouri and therefore had the right to maintain this action. R S.…
1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.
This is a suit in replevin to recover the possession of several shoe manufacturing machines; and this is the second appeal of this cause to this court. The opinion disposing of the former appeal is reported in 210 Mo. 631.
After the cause was remanded, both parties appeared in the circuit court and announced ready for trial, and after the jury had been selected and duly impaneled, the court, prior to the introduction of any evidence and over the objection of the appellant, instructed the jury as follows:
“The court instincts the jury that their verdict must be for the defendant. The court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hamilton v. MarksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Stack v. General Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.