Legal Opinion
People v. Martinez
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2017No. D067052; D067561PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
A jury found Marcellus Lopes Lee, Daniel Paul Romero and Francisco Jose Martinez, Jr. (together, appellants or defendants), guilty of fraud in the offer or sale of commodities. (Corp. Code, § 29536.) Lee and Romero were also convicted of conspiracy and grand theft of personal property. (Pen. Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(4), 487, subd. (a).) The jury found that the takings exceeded certain dollar amounts and that the victims’ losses were in excess of $150,000. (Pen. Code, §§ 186.11, subd. (a)(2) & (3), 12022.6, subd. (a)(2) (collectively, aggravated white collar criminal…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Brooks, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Francisco Martinez v. Adolfo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In re DuvalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. IsayevCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.