Legal Opinion
Diva's, Inc. v. City of Bangor
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 20, 2001No. 1:01-cv-00108PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
This is the latest chapter in the tortured history of litigation between Diva’s, Inc., Diva’s owner Dianne Cormier-Youngs, and the City of Bangor, Maine. Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Docket # 30), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket #31) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Restore Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 32). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion IN PART and STAYS the remaining proceedings. The Court DENIES…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grimm v. Borough of NorristownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Colon-Pratts v. Municipality of San SebastianDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- King's Grant Inn v. Gilford, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005