Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 23, 1996No. 1 CA-TX 94-0011PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

The taxpayers filed this action for payment of unfiled claims, and retroactive increases in previously filed claims, for certain property tax credits (“PTC”). The Arizona Department of Revenue (“DOR”) appeals from summary judgment in favor of the taxpayers. The taxpayers cross-appeal, challenging limitations the tax court placed on the relief it awarded.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2101(B) (1994). We review the tax court’s summary judgment de novo. United Bank of Ariz. v. Allyn, 167 Ariz. 191, 195, 805 P.2d 1012, 1016…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Minor v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Moulton v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Arizona Department of Revenue v. RabyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. SEMPRE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API