Legal Opinion
Moulton v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 5, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0642PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 The Arizona Legislature enacted laws that provided grants, tax credits and other benefits for persons who owned vehicles powered by an “alternative fuel,” see 2000 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 405, §§ 1-47, defined as a fuel source other than gasoline or a combination using no more than 30% petroleum. Ariz. Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § l-215(4)(Supp.2002). In response, Timothy and Tanya Moulton, Kathleen Kassmann, Frank and Janet Kassmann, Mark and Mary Katherine Clary, John and Sharon Sirovy, and Conde and Alice Sluga (collectively “the Plaintiffs”) purchased and modified…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- W. E. B. DuBois Clubs of America v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Save Our Valley Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Coconino County v. Antco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. RedlonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.