Legal Opinion

Greaf v. Breitenstein

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1933No. 14,712PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.

— In the preparation of his briefs counsel for appellant has failed to fully comply with the requirements of rule 25 of this court. We have seen fit to overlook this defect and decide this cause upon its merits.

This was an action by appellee against appellant for damages to an automobile as the result of a collision at the intersection of a north and south with an east and west country -highway in Jay County, Indiana. The cause was tried to a jury, upon issues consisting of a complaint in one paragraph and an answer in general denial. Verdict was returned and judgment rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. LindIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bogorad v. DixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Meskiman v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Henry v. ConditOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Austin v. RiverOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API