Legal Opinion

Meskiman v. Adams

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1925No. 12,138PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Action by appellant in replevin for an automobile alleged to be the property of appellant and which appellee as sheriff had levied upon and was threatening to sell to satisfy a judgment against appel Rant’s mother. From a judgment in favor of appellee, appellant appeals. The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, the specifications of which are, that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law.

In February, 1921, the automobile was found in the possession of appellant’s father who had been arrested for an alleged violation…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Nichols v. Bogda Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Clarke Auto Co., Inc. v. FYFFE, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Champa v. Consolidated Finance Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. TiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API