Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 15, 1937No. Nos. 31,323, 31,332PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant for injuries received when a passenger in an automobile alleged to have been negligently driven by one in charge thereof with the consent of defendant, the legal owner. Defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and plaintiff moved for a new trial as to damages only. Both motions were denied, and each party appeals.
The main facts proved are: Plaintiff came to Austin in the forenoon of June 13, 1936, hoping to obtain steady employment with the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Stapleton v. Independent Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Ford v. HankinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Jacobsen v. DaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.