Miller & Lux v. Batz
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.—Mandamus.
The principal question raised is on plea of the statute of limitations raised by the demurrer. It does not appear by the transcript when the original petition for the writ was filed, but the respondent states that it was on January 6, 1898, and we will assume that to be the date. The demurrer was sustained, and defendant had judgment, from which plaintiff appealed. The purpose of the writ was to compel defendant to pay the plaintiff certain moneys alleged to be due plaintiff out of the swamp-land fund held by defendant.
It appears that the amount paid into the treasury of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Gas-light Co. v. MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
- Miller & Lux v. BatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- County of Kings v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Carpenter v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pomona City School District v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- City of Bisbee v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Reclamation District No. 70 v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- MacMullan v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.