Legal Opinion
Cloud v. Illinois Insurance Exchange
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 1988No. CIV-88-214-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
The defendant, Illinois Insurance Exchange (Exchange), moves the Court for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Exchange contends that it was wrongfully joined as a defendant in this action because it is not a party to a contract of insurance between the plaintiffs, Mike Cloud and Lucky Lady Club, Inc., and the Exchange’s co-defendant, Britamco Underwriters, Inc. (Britamco). 1 Based on this insurance con tract, the plaintiffs state two causes of action against the Exchange, one for breach of contract, and the other for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. PicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Wiley v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Administratia Asigurarilor De StatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Klockner Stabler Hurter Ltd. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Wolverton v. BullockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- First Nat. Bank of Louisville v. LustigDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.