Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Louisville v. Lustig

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 14, 1992No. Civ. A. 87-5488, 88-1682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

First National Bank of Louisville (FNBL) commenced a bad faith action against the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aetna) and Federal Insurance Company (Federal) for their refusal to pay FNBL’s claim under the fidelity bond on which they were co-sureties. Almost five years later, 1 FNBL amended its complaint to add Chubb Corporation and Chubb & Son, Inc. as defendants on counts of bad faith, conspiracy, intentional interference with contract, and agency. The Chubb companies are allegedly interrelated with Federal, but the exact nature of the relationship…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eugene Schwartz and Pamela Schwartz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Robert E. ComteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Sudamax Industria E Comercio De Cigarros, Ltda v. Buttes & Ashes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
  3. Wolverton v. BullockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API