Legal Opinion
Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 2002No. 00CA0681PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge ROY.
Plaintiffs, Thomas A. Cary (Cary) and Beth Hanna, individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, Dena Cary, appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (United) and Mutual of Omaha of Colorado, Inc., d/b/a Antero Health Plans (Antero). We affirm and do not address the cross-appeals of United and Antero.
Thomas Cary was an employee of the City of Arvada and participated in the city's self-funded Medical and Disability Program Health Care Plan, which was administered by the Arvada Medical & Disability Program…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003