Legal Opinion
State v. Meehan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 28, 2002No. SC 16520PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, James Meehan, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of three counts of possession of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a),1 one count *374of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-1192 and 53a-123 (a) (3)3 and three counts of perjury in violation of General Statutes § 53a-156 (a).4 On appeal, the defendant claims that: (1) the evidence admitted at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction of three counts of possession of a narcotic substance and three counts of perjury; (2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.