Willett v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
The principal issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in setting aside a $75,000 jury award in favor of plaintiff and in granting defendant’s motion for new trial.
I
Plaintiff Wayne Willett brought suit claiming that defendant Ford Motor Company intentionally interfered with his contractual relations by causing him to be fired as bump shop manager of Walt Hickey Ford, Inc., a Ford dealership, because plaintiff had testified adversely to defendant in a products liability case, Robinette v Ford Motor Co, Wayne County Civil Action No. 29555. In his own trial, plaintiff testified that on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lapasinskas v. QuickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Koepel v. St. Joseph HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Felice v. WeinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Clark v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Kailimai v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jackovich v. General Adjustment Bureau, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kirk v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ritchie v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.