Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Wheadon

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1942No. L. A. 18075PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, C. J. —

This action was instituted by the widow and minor children of George T. Hinds, deceased, to recover damages for his wrongful death, which was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants. The deceased was employed as a welder by E. H. Irwin who did business as the Irwin Welding Works. The defendant, I. M. Wheadon, did business as the Allied Petroleum Company, and in connection with his business employed the defendants Chester Fisher and Mark Haines. On February 23, 1937, Hinds was directed by his employer to go to the premises of the Allied Petroleum Company for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API