Legal Opinion

Gomes v. Byrne

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1959No. Sac. 6919PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought damages under the so-called Dog Bite Statute (Civ. Code, § 3342) for injuries inflicted by defendant’s dog. Following a trial without a jury, judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from said judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The latter order is not appealable and therefore the purported appeal therefrom must be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proe., § 963.)

Defendant is a practical nurse and uses her premises as a private nursing home. At the time of the occurrence, the house and yard were surrounded by a wire fence with a closed gate. A path…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ching Yee v. Dy FoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Sloboden v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Smythe v. SchachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Herrle v. Estate of MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Priebe v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Davis v. GaschlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Tavernier v. MaesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API