Legal Opinion
Boarman v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 9, 1991No. Civ. A. WN-89-923PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Currently pending before this Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all three counts of plaintiff’s Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion shall be granted.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff claims that defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by (i) discriminatorily denying her promotions on the basis of sex; (ii) creating a hostile work environment; and (iii) retaliating against her for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1
Defendant contends that summary judgment is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LaRou v. RidlonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Glunt v. GES Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Howze v. Virginia PolytechnicDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995
- Ward v. Johns Hopkins UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.