Legal Opinion

Williams v. Carr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1969No. File 10666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENTTO, Judge.

This is an action for personal injury arising out of an accident between an automobile driven by the plaintiff and a truck being operated by the defendant's agent. The circuit court, over objections by the defendant, ordered him to answer interrogatories served by the plaintiff. These inquired whether the defendant was covered by liability insurance at the time and place of the accident, and if so, the name of the insurer and the limits of his coverage. Pursuant to SDC 1960 Supp. 33.0704—33.0707 defendant was granted permission to appeal from that intermediate order.

We dealt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laddon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Pettie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Doak v. Superior Court of L.A Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Ellis v. GilbertUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bean v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Alger v. American Family Mutual InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API