Legal Opinion

Doak v. Superior Court of L.A Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1968No. Civ. 32084PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOY, J. pro tem. *

This is a proceeding for a writ of prohibition restraining the Superior Court for Los Angeles County from enforcing an order requiring petitioner to answer certain interrogatories. The order was made in an action now pending in that court entitled Dobiesz v. Doak, number SO C 13976, in which plaintiffs seek to recover general damages for the wrongful death of their son, allegedly caused by wanton, reckless and negligent acts of the defendant, petitioner here, in the operation of bis automobile on August 10, 1966. Upon the issuance of our alternative writ, the real parties…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. General Electric Credit & Leasing Corp. of P.R., Inc. v. Concessionaires, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  3. Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API