Legal Opinion

Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New Jersey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1969No. File 10570PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOMEYER, Judge.

The defendant, United Security Insurance Company, hereafter called United, issued to the plaintiff, Charles G. Kunkel, a public liability insurance policy insuring him against claims for death or bodily injury and property damage resulting from the operation of Kunkel's automobile. The limits of the policy for death or bodily injury were $25,000 for one person and $50,000 for one accident and $5,000 for damage to property. While this policy was in force Kunkel drove his car into the rear of an automobile being driven by Richard D. Ronken. In a subsequent suit Ronken recovered…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Champion v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API