Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alger v. American Family Mutual Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1969No. File No. 10540Published

1DissentHanson, Judge

The Rules of Civil Procedure should be construed "to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action." Following this admonition to the periphery of permissible discovery in the concurrent case of Williams v. Carr, 84 S.D. 102, 167 N.W.2d 774, this court holds a plaintiff in a tort action has a pretrial discoverable interest under RCP 33 in any policy of liability insurance carried by the defendant.

Contrariwise, defendant in the present action is denied pretrial right of discovering the report and opinion of opponent's expert witness under RCP 34. The scope of discovery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dudek v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Highway Commission v. EarlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  4. Colden v. R. J. Schofield MotorsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
  5. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API